Tuesday, July 18, 2017

Success Vs. Democracy...




Republican-Democracy, we are told, is more conducive to an environment where every individual can aspire to great financial, social and/or political success.



And that this social arrangement empowers Personal Freedom, which, we are told, allows for any individual to rise to great financial, social and/or political success.


And yet, I think we all can’t help but notice that the most successful people in our enlightened democratic republic have far more direct influence over the course of our day-to-day life than democratically elected officials.

Oligarchs are more powerful than Senators.

Celebrities are more influential than Governors.

The Media are more efficacious than Presidents.




Oligarchs, Celebrities & Media wanted Forced Integration, and so it became the law of the land under threat of prosecution and imprisonment for any who would dissent.

Oligarchs, Celebrities & Media wanted tax-payer funded Abortion,  and so it became the law of the land under threat of prosecution and imprisonment for any who would dissent.

Oligarchs, Celebrities & Media wanted Gay Marriage, and so it became the law of the land under threat of prosecution and imprisonment for any who would dissent.

Oligarchs, Celebrities & Media wanted mass migration and the destruction of ethnic nations and the Family, and  and so it became the law of the land under threat of prosecution and imprisonment for any who would dissent.





Democracies, Republics and ‘Personal Freedom’ nurture decadence, oppression and tyranny on a scale no Monarchy or Dictatorship ever could.


From local town cronies to rock stars dinning with elected leaders to influence domestic and foreign policies, Success has overwhelmingly defeated and devoured the Democracy which birthed it .




...


Saturday, July 15, 2017

Shades Of Russia...




The following was first posted here in 2014




2014 is the 100 year anniversary of the start of WWI.

Four years later, in July of 1918, as the "Great War" was in its closing months, Czar Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, their five children (four girls and a boy) and four servants were taken into a basement by their Bolshevik captors and viciously butchered.

They weren't merely shot. No, they were beaten with riffles and stabbed to death with bayonets. The four girls, Olga, Tatiana, Maria and Anastasia (aged 22 to 17) died the hardest as, according to the man who oversaw the massacre, it took close to 30 minutes to beat and stab them to death as they screamed and cried and fought for life.

The reaction from the outside world ranged from silence to jubilation. And that includes America, who, after all, was fighting to keep the world “safe for democracy” and the Czar was a king and we believe in “freedom and equality”.

There are many pictures of the royal family online and many of them are of private family moments. In them you see what looks like a typical White Christian Middle-Class family.

Which is, essentially, what they were.

Nicholas abdicated in the hopes of avoiding a civil war. What he was blind to was the fact that the Bolsheviks had engineered the crisis’s which had swept the country. They had bribed, threatened and murdered officials, big and small, organized riots and disrupted transportation routes to cause a breakdown in the infrastructure and cause maximum chaos.

They created a crisis, and then offered themselves up as the solution.

Great Britain and the Good Ol’ USofA gave financial and tactical support to the Bolsheviks in the hopes that a broken Russia could then be plundered of its resources. This is especially grievous as Russia was a key ally of Britain and the USA during the war.


After the Czar abdicated he and his family were placed under arrest by the provisional government, which soon fell to the Bolsheviks. The royal family was moved east, near the Ural Mountains, where they spent the remaining months of their lives in captivity.

They were, based on the testimony of their guards, polite, respectful and friendly to their captors even as their captors plotted their murder.

They passed their time growing vegetable gardens, chopping wood and reading to one another in the evenings. There are even photographs of the home altar they built for Christmas.

They held out hope that their friends and family in England (king George was Nicholas’ cousin and the Czarina was the granddaughter of Queen Victoria) were working on negotiating their release and exile from Russia.


Their final residence was known as “the house of special purpose”.



The day of their deaths the Bolshevik captain, Yakov Yurovsky, planned their demise while giving the family the pretense of normalcy. During his inspection of their rooms he even asked about the health of the Czar’s son, 13 year old Alexi.

By all accounts the family never suspected a thing.

Some time after midnight on July 18, Yurovsky woke the family and their four servants and told them they must move into the basement of the house for their own safety as the White Russians (who were anti-Communists) were advancing on the town and stray bombs might hit the house. This was, of course, a lie.

They all filed into the basement, politely smiling at their guards. The Czar came carrying his son Alexi in his arms, as the boy was too sick to walk (he spent most of his short life sick and an invalid).

Some time later Yurovsky read the order for the killing of the Czar. He and 9 to10 other assassins opened fire on the whole group. But the bullets missed most of their marks and after letting the room clear of smoke it was found that most of the victims were still alive, but wounded. And so the butchery began. The still living were violently beaten and stabbed to death in an ordeal that went on, and on and on.

The bodies were stripped and then thrown into an unmarked mass grave.

The four servants, who stayed voluntarily in spite of the Czar and his wife encouraging them to leave when they could, were a doctor, a cook, a maid and a butler.


The Communist Revolutionaries in Moscow had no problem giving the order or owing up to the crime afterwards.

Because for them it was all worth it, in the long run.

So what if Russia fell into chaos and catastrophe? They could then remold it into their own image.

So what if tens of millions suffered and perished horribly? That is the price of progress.

So what if untold numbers of innocent people fell prey to hoards of thugs, rapists and murderers? That is the necessary cost for the grand vision of social engineering on a large scale.



And it was all done in the name of Progress - for Freedom and Equality.



And if you accept Equality on moral principle, you will accept it on moral mandate as well.

If there is to be equality, there can be no Czars and there can be no Middle-Class. There can be no royal families or families of any kind -no fathers or mothers, and, subsequently, there can be no borders or nations.



This is all pertinent today as it is now July 1918 for Whites in America.

If you are White then you are already in the “house of special purpose” and you’re most likely still passing the time planting vegetable gardens and chopping wood. Your leaders are kindly re-assuring you that all is well and there is no need to be alarmed.

Though increasingly stressed and unnerved, you still hold out hope that this will all resolve itself in time to come and everything will be fine.

You’re still polite and passive and if you do protest anything, it is orderly and legal and you clean up after yourself.



But soon, very soon, you are going to be awoken in the middle of the night and told that you need to urgently move to the basement…for your own safety.





...

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Quality Of Life Is Sick...

The following was written, and edited down, piecemeal, so it may be a little rough at the edges. 




“Quality of life” has become a euphemism for a false paradigm.  I suspect it became a “thing” in parallel with the growth of decadence and hyper-wealth Americans reveled in post-WWII.

In other words, the concern for “quality of life” is a symptom of grotesque, out-of-control  selfishness and narcissism.

Snowflakes and Social Justice Warriors are the result of this. They are victims of the excessive materialism and socially ingrained exaltation of narcissism that has infected The West for the past 70 + years.

They actually believe that personal comfort and well being is a metric with which to assess life.



I’ve argued with others before that conditions in the “third world” are just fine. It’s in the industrialized nations that there is a problem with lifestyles as is evidenced by the fact that the “First World” is currently, and rapidly, dying.

The modern technologically advanced world is Mordor.



Back to “quality of life”,


Moments are fleeting. 'Now' doesn’t exist because the clock is always moving.

You’re body IS going to decay. You will die. Either tragically young or due to the physical rot of age. We are all ‘dead men walking’.

You are here briefly. Life is short. And even 90 year olds will talk about how fast it all went by.

Moments are fleeting and yet, in a way, all you’ve got are moments in regards to your own personal experience -if that is to be your metric.

In other words, as you are dying you are not going to be thinking about all of those high quality moments that are just bits of images of memories in your mind.

When you are in physical agony or grief you are not thinking, “I’m in hell now but the summer of 97 was awesome.” 

Memories of personal life moments do not accumulate to a thing of value. They do not accumulate at all.

Physical safety and physical comfort are luxuries that are fleeting. You neither deserve them nor can you ever sustain them.

In fact physical safety and physical comfort tend to be harmful in the long run, when there is an attempt to sustain them, because they engender a sense of false entitlement and false permanence -which leads to false safety and false comfort.

Not only does it foster the notion that nothing bad should (or can) happen to you, but it also removes the impetus of true self-sacrifice -as opposed to self-aggrandizing “charity”.

Bad things WILL happen to you. And bad things SHOULD sometimes happen to you. Old timers used to call that consequences.


True self-sacrifice is living a mundane life of hard labor to support your family. False self-aggrandizing, self-sacrifice is abstaining from a trip to Maui in honor of earth day or wearing a ribbon to support some cause.

Human beings do not self-sacrifice for “quality of life”. Soldiers don’t throw themselves onto grenades because their house has central air.

People will, however, lie, cheat, steal and kill for “quality of life”.



It’s more than a little possible that wealth-redistribution and never-ending aid to minorities and the third world, in an effort to “lift them up”, is merely an attempt to validate a destructive and perverted lifestyle by getting others to participate in it too.



There is something intrinsically sick about the very concept of “quality of life”.



...


Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Who Told You?..



Interesting little insight from the Genesis narrative of the fall of man.

When Adam tells God that he was hiding from him because he was naked, what is God’s question in response?

Notice that God doesn’t ask Adam, “how did you find out?”

No,

He asks, “who told you?”


It’s interesting in context to the way the system today operates from a presumption of objectivity.

“Studies have shown” this or “science proves” that and so on, are phrased as such to suggest some sort of transcendent knowledge that is merely beheld and acknowledged by all and sundry.

But the reality is,



Truth can be discovered.

But knowledge and information are ALWAYS passed on from one person to the next.

Somebody told you.

A Person taught you. Either by text or by speech, what you've learned is what was told to you by someone.



Truth can only be ignored, denied or suppressed.

But knowledge and information can be twisted and abused. They can be used to deceive and manipulate.

And knowledge and information are ALWAYS subject to individual bias, prejudices and predilections.

Thus Knowledge and information can never be impartial or objective.


So the question about your worldview or the worldview of others is not “what do you know”,

but rather,

“Who told you?”



...

Sunday, July 9, 2017

Sola Scriptura Is Witchcraft...



In response to someone (you know who you are)

The idea of reading through a mystical text for special knowledge of the supernatural is an inherently occultic notion.


The idea that you can uncover supernatural knowledge (aka, God’s Will) by studying a sacred text, is a purely occultic notion.

Concepts such as hermeneutics and exegesis of a sacred text come straight out of Black Magic, Sorcery and Alchemy.

Hermeneutics and Exegesis are EXPLICITLY designed tools for divination and control of supernatural forces via conjuring, by understanding and reading certain words from a mystical text.

In fact Hermeneutics derives from Hermes - a god who was seen as acting as the doorway between man and the mystical world of the spirits.

Hermes is a very important figure in occultic circles.

If you go back through the history of Alchemy, Esoterism and Magic you will see all this as clear as day.


Then there’s the idea of “quote casting”. This is where protestants quote a verse or passage from the bible to score a point for their position: so they can win an argument or reinforce a dogmatic position to affect a shutting up or shutting down of an opponent.

This is no different than a witch casting a spell -which always involves quoting from some mystical text too.


I could go on.

And before you tell me that Jesus quoted scripture to the devil, I would remind you that Jesus was the 'Word made Flesh' and his quotations were in reference to him personally fulfilling divine promises and prophecy. Ponder on that for a few moments.


In this, the Orthodox and Catholics are right, Christ founded a Church, not a book.


And that church was meant to be a governing body with power and authority to rule.

See the Council of Jerusalem, in which the Apostles debated the issue of circumcision. They, the leaders of the church, decided the issue and then sent out letters to the churches across the world carrying their instructions which all churches were to implement.

The leaders in Jerusalem decided the issue, not the local churches or the individual.



Also, there is the issue of the disciples taking it upon themselves to cast lots to replace Judas.

Why even replace Judas?

Why did they continue to set themselves apart from the other followers of Jesus, from among whom Matthias was taken?



Again, this idea of every Tom, Dick and Harry sitting around “studying” a religious text to gain “understanding” is 100% occultic.


Sola Scriptura comes directly, and wholly, out of medieval preoccupation with Witchcraft.





,,,


Friday, July 7, 2017

Moral Relativism Worked...




Remember when radical leftists were pushing ideas like moral relativism and situation ethics?

Then remember how the same radical leftists now hold to and promote puritanical extremist left-wing “ethics” and morality?

The ideological offspring of Professors pushing moral relativism are Social Justice Warriors.


How can that be?


Because the Progressives/Marxists/Libtards lie about their aims and goals.


They are in an openly declared war against traditional life (decency, beauty, etc), and they operate under the banner of “the ends justify the means”.


So yes, moral relativism was an ideological weapon used to beat down the traditional, innate, notion of right and wrong in Western peoples. Or, at the least, cause them to question it.

The left never, ever, believed in moral relativism. Even those who aggressively promoted it found it objectionable and irrational.


But they knew it was an effective assault weapon on descent folk, so they sullied their hands and wielded it.


And the conservative response?


The statist right, both secular and religious, wasted countless hours (read decades) producing critiques (books, articles, documentaries, etc) of a left-wing belief that the left-wing never believed in in the first place.


The statist right spent their time conjuring up arguments that inevitably met moral relativism half way, conceding to at least some of its hypothesis.


Let that sink in.

The old-right’s political, religious and philosophical leadership actually found ways to rationalize some aspects of moral relativism (in an attempt to counter it), even as moral relativism’s  proponents rejected the premise that moral relativism was in any way rational or defensible.


So yes, Moral Relativism worked. Because it was never meant to tear down morality. It was meant to tear down traditional morality so that globalist, progressive morality could fill the void.

And you can see the fruits today.

Read any statist conservative (secular or religious) and you will find the only fertile ground moral relativism found.


Which is why on any major, critical issue facing our civilization today, leftists will answer yea or nay while conservatives answer maybe/sorta/kinda.





...

Monday, July 3, 2017

Why CS Lewis Sucked...



There’s a reason why Tolkien basically advised Lewis to toss his Narnia stories into the garbage -they were indeed crap.

The problem with them was that they lacked depth. Which is the problem with allegory. Once you see the allegory, which is always obvious, there’s nothing else to look for or think about. It’s all surface.

Whereas Aslan was Jesus in another dimension, Frodo was a type of Christ -but not Christ. Aragorn was a type of Christ -but not Christ. Gandalf was a type of Christ -but not Christ.

Types, and their relationships and implications, are a thing you discover, often after multiple readings or observations. And such discovery engenders the desire to look deeper elsewhere. It awakens the truth within you that there is more than what’s on the surface.

Allegory, on the other hand, suppresses discovery. In fact it pro-actively distracts from it. Allegory insists that there is nothing but surface.


So yes, we live in a culture of allegory -all surface. Shallow.


And this has significant implications. Law, for example, was historically discovered via types observed in the natural world.

Today law is made to fit allegory -usually articulated as equality.


Discovery of nature leads us to conclude that a male should pair with a female.

Allegory of nature can lead us to conclude that a male can pair with another male too.


When discovery of law is abandoned for allegory of law, dysfunction and confusion will follow. And then comes corruption, destruction and collapse.








...






Saturday, July 1, 2017

Year Of The Manifesto...




I’ve noticed recently that the old Republican/Conservative Guard, which was always a soft Marxist construct, has suddenly felt the need to publish one manifesto after the other, establishing their “social principles”.

Which is very telling.

Ten years ago this group had such a strangle hold over conservatism that they never openly spoke, pro-actively, of their principles. They didn’t need to. The “middle of the road” is where they, the rational, camped and they would never dirty their hands with lowbrow activities such as official statements on principles. The hypothetical “Free Market” was their god and it would determine morality based on the purchasing activity of the citizen-consumer.

But now the manifesto’s are flying left and right.

From the Southern Baptists taking the absolutely bizarre position of condemning nationalism, even as new Pew polls show half of conservative republicans now support gay marriage.

To the Cato Institute announcing all MUST oppose racism -even though racism has no definition and is used by leftists to justify everything from assaulting cops to promoting homosexuality (yep, opposing gay marriage is racist). And yeah, yeah - I know, they're libertarians. Whatever.


It’s no coincidence that the Southern Baptists increasing support for gay marriage coincides with their leadership’s attack upon nationalism. Because a nation is an ethnic group -which is a family writ large.


And by the way, when you make an imperative statement of position, you have drawn a line in the sand.
You have made division. You have divided Us & Them.
But let’s not let such fundamental contradictions get in the way of some good old fashioned Virtue Signaling.


Why all this sudden rush to publish manifestos?

The rise of Alternative Media.

The Empire has, for the moment, lost its control of information exchange and dissemination.



While conservative think tanks busy themselves supporting IMF funded gay pride parades in the third world and Evangelical churches are presenting Spiderman-based sermons, the Alternative Right are gathering in groups online to discuss everything from philosophy to art to politics to the economy to religion.

 We are turning subjects upside down and inside out and looking at them from a myriad of angles -rather than the officially designated understanding of such things.

Podcasts can go on for hours. Discussions can unfold over weeks or months.

And yes, there is the thrill of breaking taboos.

For example, some of us have dared to refer to the historical citizens of Byzantium as Romans!!!!!!

I suspect we can look forward to the Heritage Foundation releasing a manifesto condemning that too.




...

Thursday, June 29, 2017

A Taste Of Music...



Looking back through popular music of the past 90 years it occurred to me that terms like “corny” or “hokey” or ”cheesy” or “sentimental” or “schmaltzy”, etc have used to describe music that has had a residual touch of transcendence about it.

By that I mean music that attempts to rise above the squalor of the material present -to transcend  the mere sensual and physical.

We all know pop sub-genres such as hiphop, disco, dance, punk, rock and r&b are intentionally simplistic and crude, designed to be temporary thrills for the mob.

But, what of the older popular forms upon which these genres are based?

Jazz music, for example, is also shockingly crude and one dimensional. I’d never really listened to it before until recently and when I did spend some time with it (about a month) I was amazed at how structurally unsophisticated and intellectually & spiritually lowbrow it is.

I mean I knew it was another sub-genre of pop music, but still, I was surprised at how bland and flat it was.

And the same goes for swing, big band and rag-time.

Popular music has, for the most part, reflected a rejection of any attempt at beauty and complexity, or transcendence.

Lyrically, only country music and heavy metal have made meager  attempts at transcendence. Country does so only when it runs towards gospel music -which is strange as gospel music, as a genre, runs as far from transcendence as possible.

Heavy metal, of course, revels in themes of the supernatural and historical and is, musically, generally exaggerated. And, surprisingly, much of heavy metal, musically, post-1980 has been the most structurally complex and developed of all the pop sub-genres.

It seems that when people call a song “epic”, it’s usually a modern way of saying it has a transcendent quality to it.




This is all important as music has always been seen as being representative of civilization’s “soul” and “mind”.

So what does it say when the music that is most lauded and popular lacks any inclination towards transcendence?


Perhaps more importantly, what does it portend when music that does attempt transcendence is attacked and mocked?





And just a note on love songs. Romance is not a sophisticated or transcendent idea. Despite what many have come to believe in the west over the past couple hundred years, romance is a cheap, crude parody of love. It’s a long and involved subject, but no, romance was, historically, looked upon as a vulgar mockery of love. Romance is physical, and thus temporary, sensation. As such, it is not transcendent. The music of love songs may have a touch of the transcendent about them, but the lyric and theme is most certainly not transcendent. Quite the opposite, actually.





...


Wednesday, June 28, 2017

SJW’s Because The City...



Money is NOT the root of all evil.

The City is.

Cities are, without a doubt, the most terrible weapon man invented to terrorize and destroy himself.

They rob human beings of their dignity by engineering, and engendering, unnatural dependence upon socialization.

First of all, a house (or apartment or condo) is not property.

Property is land.

Everything else is just ‘stuff’.

If you have no land, you have no property.

If you have no property, you have no means of self-support.

If you can’t grow your own food (or at least part of it) and raise livestock for food, then you have no means of self-support.

That leaves you with three options: starving, subservience or crime.

Those in the city usually choose the latter two.

As such, the city has two strata of society: criminals who rule and the dependent who subsist in servitude.

Thus we see, with the SJWs, the end result -grateful slaves to statism, who, naturally, sees "equality" (aka, dependence) as the highest virtue and inequality (aka, independence) as the gravest of sins.


Secondly,

This terrible cycle enables merchants to exert influence and control over the inhabitants of the city, who are kept amused and nullified with bread and circuses.

And since there is a price for a ticket into the circus, money is a secondary evil who’s malice is made possible by The City.




...

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

A World Without Racism...



Funny how everything that makes the First World the First World, is what is destroying the First World.

And everything that makes the Third World the Third World, is why the Third World is flourishing.

Currently White people (aka, European Peoples both in Europe and her colonies abroad) have collapsed from one third of the world’s population just 100 years ago to just 7% of the worlds population today. Yes, 93% of the World population are people of color.

Sadly, Japan too has been thoroughly enslaved to modern, progressive “Western Values” and is, subsequently, dying as well.


The West, be it atheist or Christian, conservative or liberal, led by America, is a plague. The evidence is undeniable.


This vision of a world without “racism” is a vision by Westerners -who are death on two feet.

A world without borders, races, ethnicities or class structures is a notion by an insane and dying people who are busily killing themselves and everything they touch.



A world without borders is an empire that knows no opposition.


The rapid decline of The West over the past 150 years -it’s decline into near total insanity and depravity, could almost make you believe the devil is real.

The age of Republics and Democracies have show the two headed beast to be the worst of all socio-political monsters.





...

Sunday, June 25, 2017

Evil Is Only Common Sense...




I just saw a post at Orthosphere about a car company running an ad with gays in it. The author writes, ‘My immediate thought: “I guess Mercedes doesn’t want straight men to buy their stuff any more.”’

No, the sad fact is Mercedes knows it has straight (White) men’s money no matter what. They know they could run a commercial showing a baby being sacrificed over a car and Murica’s straight White men would still buy one of their cars.

Because SWM’s (straight White males) are cold, hard pragmatists who KNOW that the only virtues in life are comfort and reliability.

Seriously!

It’s a long way to the job! The kids have a lot of after school programs to attend! You’ve constantly got to run to the store for one thing or another. Dad and mom are older now with medical problems and you have to take them to their specialists. I could go on.  The fact is you need a reliable vehicle. That’s just life (as it’s been designed by corporations for us).

So what if the car was blessed by a satanic priest who sacrificed a baby over it? I’ve got a lot of things going on in my life and, by-God, it’s a good car!

And you know it’s not really that much of a satire. Let’s be honest. We’ve all become masters at coming up with bullshit excuses for going along with the hideous evil that rules over us, and is devouring us.

And no excuse is more Murican than cold, hard, fu@*ing efficency.

Common Sense, after all, tells us that efficiency and pragmatism supersede any moral qualms.

If it works, it works!

If it’s more efficient, then it must be more moral.

Right?


...





Saturday, June 24, 2017

The Tyranny Of Talent...




What does a good singing voice sound like?

Personally, I don’t know.

Yeah, I know, you can name some celebrity who you think sings good because they can drag out a vocal quiver or warble their voice up and down -which is a silly fad of the day.

Pop culture has so dominated the arts for the past century that the dividing line between good and bad simply no longer exists.

With Youtube we can now get a wider take on much of the pop scene, decade by decade. We can hear bands and singers from a variety of genres.

I was recently listening to some of The Rolling Stones songs from the 60‘s and 70‘s, and...

DEAR GOD, Mick Jagger had/has a comically bad voice. Bad on record, but live it was like listening to a special needs talent show. The band was garage level quality, clanking together in some sort of harmony, I guess.
I won’t even go off on the Beatles -who genre hopped more than Spinal Tap -and were about as talented.

You have to wonder how and why some of these bands became famous.

And of course the answer is media exposure/promotion.

When I was a teenager it was Nirvana. An equally average band with another comically terrible singer.

What’s telling though, is that crappy Pop-Metal bands like Poison and Warrant were really big right before Grunge-Metal broke (and yes, Grunge was a sub-genre of Metal). So the same kids that on Monday were buying ‘Unskinny Bop’ and ‘Cherry Pie’, were, on Tuesday, buying ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’.

Whatever Media tells us is “big”, we accept as “big”, even if down deep we suspect it’s crap.

And very little of what has been pop culture has not been crap.

So what happened to talent?

Talent is Un-American and thus represents an existential threat to Murica, her global empire and all it stands for.

Because talent is too much like a monarchy. And Murica knows no (official) hierarchy.

We love the myths of the scruffy colonists overthrowing the pompous royalty or a mere monk taking on the Catholic hierarchy.

We love stories about the movie star who was discovered waiting tables, or the handicapped athlete who made it to the Olympics.

All of it completely fabricated horseshit. But it makes us feel good about the banality and irrelevance of our own lives. Fabricated exceptions become our avatars.

And of course our elite love that, as it keeps us content as we’re being exploited and destroyed.



The reality of objective talent threatens the illusion.

Talent is a threat to democracy because its qualities are objective. It can’t be made or voted on. Its ascension and reign is beyond our control and its qualities transcend the market place. When genuine talent is acknowledged it cannot be made into an avatar for the masses. It shines a bright light on the falseness of democracy and equality. It makes the rest of us feel average.

This is why it has always been a task of the gatekeepers to mock talent, and, if need be, openly attack it.

You might have noticed that when even mildly talented pop artists do appear to the wider public, critics attack and dismiss their music as “hokey” or “cheesy” or “bombastic" or some such deflective assault.

And we agree, even as deep down we don't.



...


Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Good Manners Are An Agenda...



Grace
Refinement
Mannered
Cultivated
Etc.

Have you ever met a well refined and cultivated human being that wasn’t a snake?

Me neither.

I’ve been thinking about this lately.

Every single person I’ve met who is well mannered and polite tends to be (upon getting to know them just a little better) highly unlikable and completely un-trustworthy

What I’ve come to see is that people with good manners tend to be cowardly. The good manners are a defensive/deflective shield.

Yet cowards have deeper personality flaws beyond the obvious.

So when you get past the refinement you find someone who is prone to paranoia and treachery out of an inflated sense of “me against the world”.


Yes, it’s obviously easy to see this in politics.  Narcissistic people are known to be flatterers and bullshitters. And politicians spend their entire lives ingratiating -which isn’t healthy.


But I’ve noticed this everywhere.

Gruff, uncouth and rude doctors tend to be as good (if not better) than ones with good bedside manners.

And the same is true of professionals in every field.

In fact, in business dealings I’ve discovered that good manners are almost always a sign incompetence, a bad deal or flat-out criminal intent.

An unfriendly, uncouth, loudmouth is, generally, the most honest and reliable person with whom to have business dealings with.


It’s obvious when you think about it, but good manners and refinement are designed to act as a  disguise with the intent of ingratiating.



Someone who frowns at you, want’s nothing from you.

Someone who smiles at you, has an agenda.




...

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Purple Fingers...




Yeah. Search Google Images for ‘Iraq’ and ‘vote’ or ‘election’ and you’ll be reminded of those creepy propaganda photos that were all over the news back in Bush’s America, celebrating the Iraqi Conquest with brand new voters/consumers in Iraq holding aloft purple stained fingers with which they had just participated in military-induced democracy.

Forgot about that, didn’t you?



Yep. Purple is the color of George Bush and Dick Cheney’s adventures in the middle-east which birthed ISIS, the refugee crisis,  multiple terror attacks and possibly WWIII.

Purple is now the color of conquest, destruction, totalitarianism and genocide.

Purple is the banner of Dick Cheney and Bernie Sanders.
Purple is the symbol of George Bush, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Fox News.




But don’t notice that!

Just go back to buying more stuff.





...





Sunday, June 18, 2017

Day’s West...




Someone just sent me a video of Vox Day explaining why Christianity is important to the West.

I’ve written on this issue before.

There are two ways you can look at this.

One way is to view the West as a culture that was/is constructed.

The other way to view the West is as the people inhabiting the north-west part of the old world.


Most (or many) of us take the the latter view.

The West, as culture, is what European peoples create when and wherever they are. It’s innate -both the good and the bad.

As such the West has existed for tens of thousands of years.

All of Europe was not “converted” to Christianity until just over two centuries before Columbus sailed the ocean blue. And not long after that Europe began to question the religion to such an extent that just six centuries after the Baltic peoples were converted, Nietzsche declared God dead.


Particular cultural fads are like fashion.

Christianity was a fad. Like muttonchops, or mullets.

Yes, our people dressed with the fashion for a time, but it never defined them in a fundamental way.
Clean cut, middle-class kids became Hippies who then became Yuppies, after all.


Our people are a biological reality. We’ve no doubt had numerous gods over the past 30,000 years!

The Roman Empire and Classical Greece were a brief pit stop in our history and it is highly debatable as to whether they contributed anything of value to us.

Don’t get too wrapped up in notions of civilization and high-culture. Reality, NATURE, of which we are a part, is brutish, vulgar, violent and random. Art and Architecture might look nice at times but ultimately it’s just putting lipstick on a pig. But that’s a whole other subject.



Vox then suggested that there was an attack upon the West because it was Christian.


The problem with that argument is that radical leftist globalists are currently flooding White countries with hordes of Christians.

Yes, the Muslim (read non-White) refugee crisis has become the main issue in Europe, but in North America the problem is from Christian (read non-White) immigrants. And of course western Europe was being rapidly transformed long before the refugee crisis started.

So if the attack upon us is because we’re Christian, then why are our enemies flooding us with tens of millions of Christians?



As I’ve said before, religions are akin to fortification or battle plans. They’re either good or bad plans. Christianity, monotheism, is inherently bad because it implies, falsely, a singular totality while being riddled with contradictions.

After all, how does the bible’s strong implication that Christians would be a small, persecuted minority in all times and in all places square with the notion of a Christian civilization?

Under what metric can Jesus be “good” when things like walking on water and rising from the dead are un-natural -and thus a perversion?

Supernatural  Un-natural    Same-Same.


I could go on, but I’ve gone through all this before.




...

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Do Not Worship God...




So how do you worship God?

What is worship?

Prayer, Praise and Worship are three distinctly different acts. They can overlap, but they are never-the-less, three distinctly different things.


So what is the act of Worship?

I asked a Christian friend this recently and he had no answer.

He prayed to God, he participated in “praise services” and he attended bible studies.

But he had never, in his life, worshiped God.

The Orthodox and Catholics have an answer to this. Since worship is an act which REQUIRES a sacrifice, they can point to the Divine Liturgy or Mass.


Mainstream Protestantism has no act of worship of God. Thus Protestants do not worship God.

For protestants, Christianity is completely cerebral. If you do the right mental math, then you are “saved”. If you can’t work out the calculations (doctrines) in your head, you’re damned.


I was born and raised in a monolithic protestant culture, aka the bible belt. It's what I am, it's what I know.

I have seen Christians pray to God. I have seen Christians praise God.

But I have never seen Christians worship God. Ever.

And when I ask them what the act of worshiping God is, they have no answer -and, in fact, it had never even occurred to them to ponder it.

That’s rather amazing when you think about it.

But it might be rather telling that it’s the protestant countries, led by the USA, which are building a global secular governing system.

Protestantism subsists on two things: the printing press and literacy. Minus those things, Protestantism doesn’t even exist.

‘Faith Alone’ is another way of saying, it’s all in your head.


Maybe that’s why Protestantism has no act of worship for God.

It has no God.



...

Friday, June 16, 2017

Math Is Ignorance...




2 + 2 = 4?

Why?

Because White people say so?

Do you not see the hurt that math brings about?

Do you not see that when you say that 2 + 2 = 4 that you are discriminating against the other numbers?

Do you not see the sort of narrow, hateful, thinking such borders of thought engenders?


Liberate yourself from such tyrannical, bigoted, thinking.

Love knows not deterministic calculations!

Math is ignorance! Math is hate!


...



The sad thing is this really isn't satire. Progressives really do think at this level of crazy.





...


Thursday, June 15, 2017

The First Commandment...




....denounces religious freedom.



The first commandment: THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GODS BEFORE ME, repudiates Freedom Of Religion.

Not least because the command is not individualist, but corporate.

The commandments were for the society as a whole. There was no differentiating the religious from the state or the personal from the public, until the enlightenment.


Has this obvious fact ever occurred to you, dear Christian?

Or has your religion been dumbed down, vulgarized and debased via social revolutionary thought to the point that it deserves the ridicule heaped upon it?



Freedom & Equality was not only Satan’s rallying cry in the Garden of Eden, but it has also been the slogan of the mad mobs who burned down churches and beheaded Christians.


The very ideas of personal freedom, racial, ethnic, class or gender equality, etc. are antithetical to good. Because good is order. And order is, by nature, particular, structured and hierarchical.

Chaos is where you will find equality.

And Chaos is the God that 99.9% of the Churches in Murcia worship.









...



Sunday, June 11, 2017

United With Christians?...



Christians are not a people anymore than horse thieves are a people.

Christianity is a behavior. Like stealing horses is a behavior.



Irish are a people. English are a people. Scottish are a people.


Identity is biological, not choice. To argue otherwise is to assent to Bruce Jenner being a woman.



Making an alliance with Christians is not about working with a people, but about working with individuals who behave in a certain way.

This is why there are “good” Christians and “bad” Christians and so many different denominations of Christians. For about the past 800 years everyone has been basically forced to call themselves Christian. However, genetics determines your identity and your proclivities.

So it’s a question of what kinds of people lay behind the descriptor. Some people are born to steal horses, others are born with the potential to steal horses and others are born that can never steal horses. Hence, devout believers and apathetic believers and atheists.

It’s genetics, not personal choice.




...

Thursday, June 8, 2017

Why Sluts Are Un-American...



They give it away for free!

And that goes against the very pillars of our post-enlightenment, post-industrial capital-driven civilization.

It’s a banker’s world, after all.

Prostitutes, on the other hand, are patriots. They’re entrepreneurs. They’re self-reliant.

The only reason they’re prosecuted is because their business is unregulated and government doesn’t get its fair share of the money.


So yes, we’re all prostitutes. Except the sluts.


EXAMPLE:

With prostitution, men use a woman’s body for sexual pleasure in exchange for money.

In Construction, construction companies use men’s bodies to build buildings in exchange for money.

Laborers are literally picked up off of street corners in large cities.



See, we’re all selling a service which we perform in exchange for money, which means we are all selling ourselves.



It doesn’t matter whether you bag groceries or pull teeth, you are selling yourself via a “skill” in exchange for money.

Got a degree from Harvard? The Professors were, essentially, “rented" by the university for that teaching service.

And guess what?

You’ll get to hang that degree on a wall, as you sell yourself in exchange for money.

Round and round it goes.



It wasn’t always like this.

In times past the only people who participated in such exchanges were prostitutes, prisoners and slaves.



Everyone else raised the food they ate, made the clothes they wore and built the houses they lived in.

For anything more they would trade.

Taxes were paid in chickens or cows.

And land? Well you can’t take land with you when you die anyway, now can you?

That system was predicated on mutually beneficial assistance provided by large families within tribes, aka extended families.


But now, under the current system, we’re all independent. We just have to sell ourselves for money for food & shelter.



But I guess there is no alternative to the present system.

Right?


I mean, it’s gotta be the free market or socialist or some sort of thing like that.


We can’t just shut down the factories or put the merchants and bankers out of business.


We just need better policies -better management and regulation of this glorious liberating  system.



Right?


...

Monday, June 5, 2017

The Alternative Media Dies Every Day...




“To learn is to die and be reborn.” said an acquaintance to me recently.

I’ll admit, I laughed in his face. And I apologize.

I get what he was saying. It’s just that it was phrased in such a sincere grad-student kind of way that it sounded like satire.

But the thrust of it is sort of true.

The alternaverse is expanding because it is questioning the sacred doctrines of Cathedral (to borrow the Nrx expression).


While the left-wing and right-wing struggle for the privilege to set policy on the shop floor the alternative media is asking if the factory itself is the problem.

Those are two radically different paradigms of conceiving of society.




So to my friend I might rephrase the statement as, “to reconsider is to die and be reborn.”


That is what the alternaverse is about, really. Reconsidering the whole project, not simply learning the floor-plan.






...

Sunday, June 4, 2017

Luxury Ethics...




Pontification over moral values and actions and reactions are, often, though not always, akin to mental onanism.

Hard physical work cures depression.

Hard physical work also solves moral conundrums.

Yes and No come much easier to a man striving to survive from one day to the next than it does to a man fretting over where to vacation this summer.



Grey moral areas, and “nuance” are byproducts of luxurious, decadent, living.



...

Reverb In An Echo Chamber...




Is there a solution?

No.


Yeah, I know it’s a heresy to state that there is actually no solution to the myriad of problems facing the world, but, well, so be it.


This idea, this notion that the world is a big nail waiting for the right hammer to come along is actually a bigger problem than the perceived problems -which are in actuality just part and parcel of normative existence.

Maybe this goes back to the industrial revolution -this idea that “we can fix it”.

Or maybe it goes back to 1950‘s science-fiction films where scientists smoking pipes always found a way to destroy the monster. I don’t know.

But wherever it came from it has been nothing but a giant pain in the ass.

From Alcoholics Anonymous to Jenny Craig, this absurd notion of “fixing” the normal fuckupery of life has caused tens of millions of people to fall into the despair of wondering why it all goes wrong some other way, anyway.

You’re gonna get old, You’re gonna get sick. You’re gonna die. And as you await that inevitable end, life will kick the ever-loving shit out of you, over and over and over.....


The world’s problems work themselves out because people die.
Alcoholics eventually die. Drug addicts die. Politicians, bankers, bakers, farmers, thieves, homeless, etc, we all eventually end up six feet under.



Problems aren’t made, they’re born. And they’ll keep being born till the end of time. But they also go away, via time.


So enough with the self-help bullshit. It just panders to the snowflake in all of us and creates a warped view of how life actually is. Preachers, politicians, philosophers and so on, have no answers.


Because there’s no solution or cure. All we can do is deal with it as best we can in the short little span of time that we're here.

We’re all just biding our time on this rock, waiting of Godot.




...

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

No One-God Without The City...



Following on the  previous Polis (City) vs. Arcadia (Country) paradigm from previous posts,



Monotheism, the ideology of there being one god to rule all, is the epitome (and inevitable outgrowth) of The Polis’s perception of itself and the attempt at justification for its moral directive to war on Arcadia.

If the City must needs articulate itself and conceptualize itself as a singularly planned and constructed universal, then ultimately it will construct a cosmology to mirror its self perception.

If The Polis is built with intent and design by sentient, intelligent beings then so too must the universe have a designer; an architect, no less.

If The Polis is organized and planned, so too must be the world.

Centralization begets centralization.

And so we see why they utilize such terms as Pagan (rural) and Heathen (uncultivated) to describe all that is threatening about Arcadia, in its unorganized, un-planed manner.

A heath is a piece of land unmarred by those “dark satanic mills”, and a heathen is a man who knows not the one god.


II



Monotheism, be it Christianity, Judaism, Islam or, to a lesser extent, Zoroastrianism, is a socio-political ideology. It is the Polis’s ultimate attempt at self actualization. It functions on a planned, engineered, conceptualized and constructed program.

As such, The Polis is a Pyramid. Everything must reach a singular point. All roads MUST lead to Rome, so to speak.


If there isn’t one god, one morality, one universal paradigm to which/whom all must submit, then The Polis falls apart. It’s very nature would be seen as inconsistent and untrue.


If society can form organically and function without and beyond planned organization, then the city's presupposition of its own inherent nature becomes entangled in self-doubt.




For the Arcadian there must be,at the least, two gods: Chaos and Order. Ever locked in combat, with neither one fated to prevail over the other.

In the general, though, there are many gods in Arcadia: light, darkness, wind, rain, heat, cold, harvests, malice, fertility,etc.

And yet it might be argued that there are no gods for the Arcadian. For the world is random, fickle, absurd, horrific and redundant (circular).


Frustratingly for The Polis in its critique of Arcadia, both seemingly contradictory possibilities are strangely complimentary in the eyes of the Arcadian.





,,,



Sunday, May 28, 2017

The Secret Plan Of The NWO...




All the chaos -the rage, the protests, the non-nonsensical policies and insane military brinkmanship, the open borders, economic shenanigans and cultural and moral anarchy,

all of it,

is because the rich old man is dying and won’t accept it and so is applying all his wealth on a plethora of doctors and treatments in the delusional belief that he can be the one person in history to defy nature, reverse old age and live forever.



In other words, the experiment has failed. The Old Man being the post-Enlightenment world order of liberal democracy, industrialism and capitalism/socialism.  Which is Murica and its empire personified.

It failed.

It’s dying.

But lacking all dignity and self-awareness, it imagines itself able to somehow make a come back and go on living for another few hundred years.

Like all sad demented men, greedy for more life, it believes it must go on. That the world will fall to ruin with out it.

And so to that end, it will bankrupt its wealth, destroy its home, cast out its own family and damn its still healthy and vital neighbors to hell, sparking conflict where it can in the bitter resolve to bring everybody else down to its misery and agony.


That is what the new world order is.

That is what is happening in the West today.


It’s the death-throws of a system.

There’s no grand secret plan. What you’re seeing is panic and desperation fueled by self-delusion.





....

Saturday, May 27, 2017

Insanity Is A Safe Space...





Religions and Belief Systems, be they supernatural, political or generally ideological are nothing more than an attempt to reduce your personal experience of reality to the smallest possible safe space.

And it doesn’t work. Not even for mad men.

What is real is physical: race, gender, family, tribe, life, old age, death and so on.

You cannot alter nor bypass these real things.

Values, ethics, morals, etc are predetermined by genetics.

And, yes, your belief that these things can be overcome or fashioned and spread to various peoples is because of your genes.

It’s not a learned conviction.

Your convictions are predetermined by your genes -and if your convictions are “revolutionary” or “progressive” that means they are a mutation.

There is no such thing as freewill.


Belief systems and ideologies are a coping mechanism. Which is why some people are impassioned by them, while most are not. Most are apathetic to even those things they affirm their belief in (“abortion is murder let’s see who won the game”) because they are able to deal with reality, for the most part.


So when you see someone speaking of values and ethics and culture, as though they were an external and learned phenomena, don’t waste your time trying to convert them or change their mind.


Because you’d be conversing with a mad man hiding in his safe space.




...



Friday, May 26, 2017

Convenient Convictions...



If you are uncomfortable about expressing your beliefs or fear persecution for espousing them then keep them to yourself or within your close circle of family and friends.



But if you’re going to assert a position publicly, to an audience, stop watering it down  to appear to be in the middle of the road, aka “reasonable”.


Because the people to whom you are addressing lie about their beliefs and opinions anyway. All the time. Every day, in fact.



“Does this dress make me look fat?”
“No. No it doesn’t”

“What did you think of my kids in the talent show?”
“Your kids are very talented.”

“Do you think my fiance is pretty?”
“Yes.”

“I’m thinking of starting my own business at home.”
“I’m sure you’ll be very successful.”


See, we all lie...all the damn time.


Only in extreme moments of life and death do most people actually state their true beliefs or  act in accordance with their convictions, or lack there-of.


So again, why would you go to the trouble of mounting a soapbox with a bullhorn only to pander to an audience before whom you have presented yourself and your message? Unless, of course, you’re just selling something.

Why would you try to make your views more palatable to people who are going to lie about how they feel about them anyway? Unless, of course, you’re just selling something.

Most people go along to get along while it is conducive to their continuing personal comfort to do so.


The people who say they are uncomfortable with your views in peace time will most likely be your staunchest allies in the trenches of actual war.


So yes, while most go along with the predominant ideology of the system today and profess their belief in its tenants, you can rest assured that about 75% are lying and, given the opportunity, would participate in overthrowing that very same system.

Many of those sitting on the fence of apathy today are burning with zealotry on the inside.

Likewise, the zealots of peacetime are the cowards of wartime.


So to all the “movement personalities” out there jumping on to stages and calling attention to yourselves, either cut the crap and be honest about your positions or get off the stage.

Unless, of course, you’re just selling something.




...

Thursday, May 25, 2017

Why Globalists Love Terrorism....





Simply put, it helps propel the establishment narrative of the redefining of “us” and “them”.


Globalists are hell bent on creating a one world system. To this end they must, in the hearts and minds of the peoples of The West, irradiate all remnants of traditional and natural demarcations -namely family, nationality, gender, hierarchy and race.

And they’ve largely succeeded. First and foremost via mass migration of non-Whites.


But also notice how “us” is now a gay disco or multicultural pop concert that revels in orc-like behavior?


If “them” are terrorists, and terrorists are international, “us” is also, necessarily, international.

“Us” is no longer a particular people with unique and particular ethnicity, culture, language and religious customs.

No, “us” are global citizens, with "democratic values"- whatever the hell that is.



Those of you who think these ongoing attacks will cast a revealing light on the problems of Islam or multiculturalism are missing the mark by about a mile.


Terror attacks confirm and consecrate the globalist paradigm.

This is why talking head leaders announce that this is all part of daily life now in the new cosmopolitan world of “us”. It unites “us”. It defines “us” via juxtaposition with “them”.

They love to speak of "authoritarian regimes" or "extremists" because for them identity is only ideological or choice, not physical and biological (think Caitlyn Jenner for example).


You want to break this spell?

For one thing, stop calling them muslims. Religion is NOT an identity. Call them what they actually are: Arabs or Turks or Egyptians or if they’re mixed, mongrels, etc.


Because, again, a Nation is NOT a place or form of government.

A nation is an ethnicity.

A state or kingdom can have physical borders, but a nation’s borders is blood.



This is why the western world continues to fall into chaos and destruction: too many would rather talk about what they are or what they do are rather than who they are.





...

Tuesday, May 23, 2017

Time Travel With The Alt-Right...




Another word for discrimination is, choice. 



With all the new people flooding into the Alt-Right such old and worn out rebuttals to left-speak is a revelation.

Whenever I look at the comments sections of various alt sites and blogs it’s like going back about 15 years and seeing all the same discussions rehashed and wrestled with all over again.

Time is being wasted this way.



Look, to all the newbies out there, you have to get it into your heads that the left and its ideology are not reasonable. Their assertions are riddled with contradictions.

Don’t react to what they claim or assert. Dissect their assertions and find the contradiction and mock it.

Remember that their questions are never questions: they are emotional talking points dressed up with a question mark.


Remember that the left do not engage in dialogue. They can’t. Their beliefs and assertions are self-contradicting and they don’t actually believe in them anyway.

So don’t waste your time engaging with them by presenting facts or logic-based arguments. They’ll simply change the subject, dodge the point or move the goal posts.

To shut them down you shut them up by not acquiescing to their demented worldview.

Example:

Lefty: “Race is a social Construct.”

Me: “So is equality”.



That’s all it takes. They shut up and go away.





Lefty: “That’s racist”

Me: “There’s no such thing as racism”



Lefty: “ that’s fascist”

Me: “So is nature”



Lefty: “All people bleed red”

Me: “So do rats”




You have to treat leftists the same way a veteran comedian treats hecklers. Because that is what the leftists/progressives are. They’re just hecklers. Nothing more. They have no substance or motivation beyond that role.







...

The Apocalypse As Spring Cleaning?...




Unlike hippies or new-age pagans, Arcadians (country or rural people) are more genuine children of nature, or people of the earth. They share the earth’s agonies and ecstasy because they do not reverence it as being some other thing, apart from themselves. Man cannot destroy nature, because man is nature.

In contrast, The Polis (the city) views the earth as a foreign thing upon which they happen to reside. They speak of nature, not as nature, but as a thing. They speak of the relationship (good or bad) between man and nature, whereas the Arcadian intuit man and nature as, essentially,  synonymous. Or, at the least, interconnected intrinsically.



For the Arcadian, it is not man that is foreign to the world, but The Polis; the city -civilization. Thus the Arcadian looks upon natural disasters as purging and cleansing, whereas The Polis see them as destructive -to their projects.

Indeed, The Polis divide disaster into ‘man-made’ and ‘natural’, while the Arcadian see no distinction as man is natural.

When nature unleashes its fury it is The Polis that suffers, physically and existentially. An Arcadian expression “the damn has broken” is an expression of satisfaction of nature contravening the machinery (and thus power) of The Polis. The waters, held unnaturally captive, burst forth.


In that, ‘natural disasters’ are an organic part of the war between Arcadia and The Polis.



II


Many ancient cultures had myths of devastating floods which would destroy all but a few people.
These floods would restore balance to a world hopelessly besieged by The Polis.

In contemporary times we see a constant stream of prophesied doomsday events.

The Rapture/rise of the Anti-Christ and destruction of the world order.
Y2K, in which machinery would cease to function and society would revert back to a more technologically “primitive” circumstance.
The 2012 Mayan Calender End, which would signify the end of the world.

The list is long.


Indeed, what is the “New World Order” but The Polis as Cosmo (universal).

Fears of the Illuminati, Mind Control, World Government, Aliens, WW III, etc. are all indirect manifestations of the Arcadian’s instinctive reaction to The Polis’s war upon them. A war which is indirect in confrontation, yet implicit in its end result.

Thus the "end of the world" scenario, be it nuclear war or an asteroid striking the earth, is the hypothetical direct response.


And the controversial aspect of this is that the Arcadian does not truly fear such catastrophes, but actually yearns for them.


The cracking of concrete is threatening to that which is built upon it. But for the green grass held prisoner beneath, it is the breaking of a damn.



In this we can see that present day infatuation with, and constant prophecy of, "doom and gloom" is, in actuality, a messianic-type of hope for the Arcadian.


More interesting still, is that this long looked for cataclysm is always seen to be an inevitable movement of nature. Like the world flood mythos of old.




...

Monday, May 22, 2017

The City Is The Enemy...



As was seen in previous post on the subject, country-people, 'Arcadians', are Pagans, as that word denotes a territory (and a people) limited by defined, marked, points. Whereas The Polis is ever-growing and ever redefining its borders and itself. The Polis is universal.

Arcadians are rooted, defined and fixed in particular quantity and quality and space; ethnic, tribal, clannish.


The world of the Arcadian does not extend beyond the country of their particular, specific, people. Their rivers, forests, lakes and mountains are all solid boundaries of their existence, physically, philosophically and spiritually. Which is why they can never be truly Polis, cosmopolitan or civilized.

For example, among the back-country settlers of Appalachia the word ‘foreigner’ was/is applied to any and all (persons and things) who were not immediately proximate to themselves. A stranger may be of the same race and ethnicity, speak the same language and worship the same god, yet be suspiciously labeled a foreigner because he is from outside of the borders of a particular local people.

Within The Polis, all are strangers and yet all are of the Polis. All are ‘us’.

The consequence of this contrast in the conception of borders and boundaries is substantial, and leads to conflict.

That the Arcadian does not see a planet, continent or state as such, but rather (and only) a world consisting solely of his people and his world, means that when The Polis and Arcadia meet, they conceptualize one another via wholly different, and incompatible, paradigms.



The battle lines can thus be seen as follows: a man from Arcadia may be able to become part of The Polis, but a man from The Polis can never become part of Arcadia.


At first glance this may seem to give the advantage to The Polis, but upon further consideration it is, at least, a draw.

The threat to Arcadia (inclusion) is countered by the impenetrable barrier (exclusion) of The Polis.

The Polis must then adopt an unending offensive tactic, while Arcadia is always on the defense.


The irony of this being, these battle positions, born of the intrinsic qualities of each side, merely reinforces each sides intrinsic qualities.





...

Friday, May 19, 2017

The Deep State Is The Polis...


  
Below is a summary of terms and lines of the battle underway.




The so-called “deep state” is merely the heart of planned society, aka civilization, aka The Polis.




Arcadia A region of ancient Greece in the Peloponnesus. Its relatively isolated inhabitants proverbiably lived a simple, pastoral life.

Polis The Greek term for a city-state -an area dominated by and administered from a central fortifiable town; a city.



Arcadia is a Greek word associated with rural, pastoral life: AKA, the country.

Polis is the Greek word for the Latin Civitas, or City. And from that word we get the words civilization and civilized.



Cosmopolitan is a combination of Cosmo (universal) and Polis (city). Thus Cosmopolitan means Universal-City. And it often refers to its culture and value system.



For many ages there has been an ongoing struggle  between The Polis and Arcadia. Between organized (planned/engineered) society and organic (rural) society.

The tension between Arcadia (the country)  and The Polis (the city)  derives from the reality that Arcadia is organic and The Polis is contrived.

For The Polis, identity is constructed and articulated and seen as ideology and conceptualized as ‘idea’. It is planned. It is built.


For the Arcadian identity is unexamined and/or taken for granted.

Whereas The Polis is planned and reflective, Arcadia is not.

Arcadia has an observable form, but Arcadia itself does not observe it.


Arcadia has society, without having a society. It has politics without being political. It has religion without being religious. It has organization without being organized.


These attributes of Arcadia not only run contrary to The Polis, they run contrary to the fundamental presuppositions upon which The Polis is built.

As The Polis is engineered and artificial, and must constantly articulate the justifications for its own function, it must assert that outside of its construct chaos must reign.

That Arcadia functions, successfully and without chaos, century after century, is an existential threat to The Polis.


War of Words


Just look at the etymology of expressions and terms of division and dehumanization concocted or used by The Polis.


Pagan from late Latin paganus, meaning villager; rustic/noun use of adjective meaning “of the country, of a village,” from pagus “country people: province, rural district”.

Pagan simply means country people, or people not living in the city.


Country from Latin Contra, “opposite, against- contrary”.

So country means to oppose and be against. Against what? The Polis (the city) of course.

Pagan also means “district limited by markers” thus related to pangere “to fix, fasten,” from PIE root *pag -”to fix”.


A fixed place, in other words. Something rooted. As opposed to cosmopolitan, which implies either implicitly or explicitly, rootlessness.




As seen above, pagan, or country-people, is also synonymous with villager. And villagers live in country houses traditionally called villas.

Village is the source of the word villain, which is a bad or evil person. So Arcadia (country people) are not only “contrary” passively to The Polis, but are seen as actively a threat.


Following on the pagan-means-fixed definition above, consider the word ‘Province’ which is another designation for country and from which we get the word, provincial.

Provincial of or concerning the regions outside the capital city of country, especially when regarded as unsophisticated or narrow-minded


Again, country and country-people (Arcadians) are defined as unsophisticated (contrary) and narrow-minded (fixed).


Then there is the derogatory word, Heathen. It derives from the word Heath, which means uncultivated land. And, of course, from the word cultivate we get the word, culture.


The striking insinuation of this term, and its use by The Polis, is that wild and untamed forests, fields and meadows are not only unpleasant, but a threat.





Rural mean of the countryside. Thus rural means contrary and to be against; villainy.


Rustic means country person or peasant -of the country, rural; country-like, plain, simple, rough, coarse, awkward. 


As we can see, if you do not live in, and partake of, The Polis (the city) you are coarse, awkward and unsophisticated. You are narrow-minded, rooted and fixed. You are a Pagan, a heathen and Villain. You are contrary.



to be continued...





...

Wednesday, May 17, 2017

Stop Outsourcing Your Life!...





Stop and consider how much of your life is sustained via unnecessary outsourcing of your own duties of self preservation to others.

Break your arm? What do you do?

You don’t know do you?

So off you go to the hospital. They know what to do. You, your family and friends -your neighbors?  Not so much.



Food & Water? The most basic necessities for sustaining your existence? Wal-mart! Wal-mart provides those things. And the water company.

And thank God for gas stations. Can’t get to Wal-mart or the doctor without gas! And thank God for electricity! Milk and eggs wouldn’t last long without a refrigerator.


Yeah these are obvious things and they are a luxury. But the “luxuries” don’t end there do they?

From childbirth to acquiring food to education to our understanding of the world to health issues to death and burial and a million small things in between, we’ve out-sourced just about every facet of our lives to strangers who have no vested interest in us or our families beyond a quick buck.


We didn’t always. Throughout most of history we handled these things ourselves.


Yeah, there’s always been money and taxes. But money existed solely for taxes (being a representation of goods), so you only ever had it to pay taxes. Because it’s easier to pay the government in coins than in chickens -though they sometimes took those too. For everything else we bartered. Okay, that's a slight exaggeration, but not by much.




There is a principle at the heart of all this.

This out-sourcing of our ability to take care of ourselves and our family is the fuel for the economic model which dominates and defines our lives here in the USA.

Let that sink in. Murica is a feedback loop.

The retardation of our ability to take care of ourselves is what fuels the economy which fuels the bureaucracy that enables the hideous system that exists because we can’t provide for ourselves anymore.

And we “elect” politicians to preserve and manage this f@cking intrusive monstrosity. Then we sit back and bitch about how intrusive and monstrous it is.



Stop deferring, instantly, to someone else to solve your problems.

Start thinking in terms of actually taking care yourself and your loved ones.

Fix your own car. Grow at least some of your own food. Become less dependent on a system that is crumbling anyway.

It’s a way of thinking and conceiving of choices that is the main issue.

It may take generations to get turned around again and go in the right direction. But every journey requires a first step.


Then again the whole thing could crash tomorrow and nature will sort out the ones who can re-adapt and those who can’t.



Stop outsourcing your life! 




...


Tuesday, May 16, 2017

Jesus Is The Anti-Christ!...



A dictator who enslaves mankind via a global, One World governmental system?

Who could that be?


“Bad Guy”
 “(the Beast) forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name.
-Revelation 13: 16-17


“Good Guy”
“It is written: "'As surely as I live,' says the Lord, 'every knee will bow before me; every tongue will acknowledge God.'”
-Romans 14:11


“Bad Guy”
“The second beast....caused all who refused to worship the image (of the Beast) to be killed.”
-Revelation 13:15


“Good guy”
“Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.” -Revelation  20:15





See, it’s not the all-encompassing totalitarian police-state that’s bad, it’s just a question of who runs it.

The belief in one god leads inevitably, inexorably, to the very monstrosity Christians so greatly fear. It’s not one-word government they tremble at the thought of, it’s just bad management of it.



As I’ve said before, Christianity is a toxic mix of three of the worst elements of antiquity: west-Asian monotheism, Greek philosophy and Roman politics.

And yeah, yeah I know, Rome gave us aqueducts and roads. Yeah, and wars gave us canned food and the microwave oven.

The Roman Empire was nothing more than a cartel that subsisted on the enslavement, rape and terrorizing of everyone around it. Rome was a gangster’s mansion surrounded by diseased and crime riddled slums filled with terrorized and exploited victims, known euphemistically as “citizens”.

Greek Philosophy was, basically, an attempt to moralize the (to this day unsupported) notion of inevitable political and cultural monopoly, aka civilization. Much of it, however, was mental Onanism.

Monotheism is desert peoples way of externalizing their social ideal of, Sheikh & Harem and mercantilism-as-transcendence. God's people are collectively called his "spouse" or "bride" and heaven is paved with streets of gold.



See the common thread that lets the three things intertwine?


Combine the three things and you get Christianity....and a push for a one world government....oh, and the anti-Christ, aka Jesus.






...

Monday, May 15, 2017

The Day A Star Was Thrown Into A Volcano...






Harry Randall Truman was the 84 year old caretaker of a lake-front lodge right next to Mount Saint Helens.

As the volcano gave off signs of imminent eruption in early 1980, old Harry became a media sensation due to his stubborn refusal to heed evacuation orders.

Of course many others remained in the danger zone too (57 people died due to the volcano, including Harry), yet only Harry became a star.

Why Harry?

He was an expressive, talkative, lonely old widower who ate up the spotlight (attention) and the media was looking for a “human interest” angle for what they knew would be a prolonged coverage of the Volcano leading up to its eruption.

Encouraged by press coverage (including celebrity profile type segments) and subsequent “give ‘em hell, Harry!” public reaction, the old man played the part the media crafted for him: cantankerous folksy anti-hero who wouldn’t let a bunch of bureaucrats drive him off his land. He received fan mail, marriage proposals and even had folk songs composed about him.

Harry, his lodge and his 16 cats ended up buried beneath about a hundred feet of mud, ash and debris.

The media knew damn well what would happen to him. He was their Captain Ahab (they loved photos of him with the Whale, I mean Volcano, in the background). And yet he was used for the ratings and for keeping people’s attention fixed firmly on the evening news entertainment.

I don’t think there is much doubt that in reality Harry was a frightened old man who wanted to flee from the danger. But every time he opened his door, there was a reporter prodding him to play his designated part.

It went something like this,


Media to Harry: “Are you going to disappoint your fans and let those know-it-all pencil necks push you off your land Harry?”

Harry: “Hell no. No one pushes old Harry around. Not even a volcano!”

Media to viewers: “That’s our Harry!”

Viewers: big toothy grins and rabid applause.


Harry was the proverbial king for a day.



I point this out for all the dumb bastards out there who find themselves “compelled” to protest for some social cause which was highlighted, scripted and staged by the media.

Ask yourself this,

If you protest and no press is there to take your picture, do you make any sound?



In Ye Olden Times there was no such thing as a protest, in the way the word is used today.

People rioted when provoked, which was rare.

But it’s hard to get good pictures and craft a narrative out of a genuine riot. Riots are out of control.


A Protest, however, is an organized and staged (there’s that word again) event. There are designated stage entrances, official lines to be read and even rehearsals. Hell, many of them are flat out paid for their performance.



Just FYI, if you’re a protester or SJW I can guarantee you, no matter what you may think, it's not of your own volition.  You may think it is, but you're wrong.  You are playing a part crafted for you and you are performing in someone’s play, the plot of which the producers consider none of you business -the finale of which involves you and a big volcano.







...




Saturday, May 13, 2017

Cancer Preens...



You can find the sentiment expressed in various ways down through the ages, because it’s true.

You rarely see people do good things because that which is good is harmonizing to consistency and  stability and undeviating from the homogeneous values and ethics of a social system.

Cancer, of course, is the opposite of that.

Social-Cancer is that which disrupts consistency and stability and deviates from the homogeneous values and ethics of a social system.

Which is why cancer stands out and, by its nature, draws attention to itself.






And as the task of sustaining a thing is dull and thankless and draws little attention to itself, the preener turns to the only thing that is guaranteed to bring instant fame: destruction. Change in a healthy body is never good -change in a healthy body is called disease.


Attack, destroy and tear down all that was and came before and you will find yourself upon a stage and in the limelight.

And in a society where adulation is a core ethic, that which works to draw attention to itself and bring change to the social order is no longer seen as a cancer, but as ‘king for a day’.


However, I think we all know what happens to such “kings” at the end of the day. (notice how every revolution inevitably cannibalizes its own)



And yet millions continue to crowd into the theater and fight for the chance to stand upon that blood-stained stage, or cheer on those who do.


But the curtain inevitably falls, and the last “king” must, to top all others, burn down the proverbial theater with everybody in it. Cancer, after all, destroy’s its host.

Death is cancer’s pinnacle -its moment of glory, even as it is it’s own demise.


Or to put it in Americanese, it is ‘The End of History’.





...

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Hooker Revolution...




The gravity of a meritocracy driven by a cult of celebrity is a tyranny of the narcissist's warped values.


This is compounded by the fact that women are social animals. They deem it important how they look and how they are perceived by the world about them. That’s fine. That’s how nature has designed them. And it’s an important part of a well balanced world.

A normal, healthy, man, on the other hand, doesn’t give a rat’s ass what the world thinks of him, how he dresses, what he says, etc. In fact (truth be told) the average man loves to “stir up shit” and leave a wake of controversy and shrieks of outrage everywhere he goes. He loves to offend people.
Again, it’s how nature designed us. It’s the counter balance to women’s need for social approval.



The drive for wide social acceptance and praise is inherently feminine.

Which is exactly why theater and performance-art were historically linked to, and seen as another form of, prostitution.
The desire to be on a stage, accepted and praised, is feminine to an unhealthy extreme. And actors take money in exchange for a performance.

“Celebrity” is not only feminine, it is feminine in the negative sense in that it is a form of prostitution -presenting and selling yourself for wide social acceptance and praise.

Of course social media plays into this in more ways than one. Some women (and effeminate men) not only love to be on facebook and the like, they also, foolishly, put every facet of their personal lives onto the Internet Stage to garner “likes” -praise, acceptance and adulation. To this end they essentially prostitute themselves and their families for applause.

This “spirit” also draws out effeminate men. Politicians and Religious Leaders, for example, have become increasingly feminine in thinking and demeanor. Both pander to audiences for wider social acceptance. Both love to be on stage and perform and heap up praise and positive appraisal. Seeker-sensitive churches and government mandated tolerance seminars are good examples of this.

A normal,healthy, heterosexual man is never, ever, “offended” or “outraged” by word or deed. (again, he in fact gets a kick out of hearing about them)

But an abnormal, maladjusted, effeminate man is, indeed, concerned with words and deeds that cause “offense” and “outrage”.

And the current decadent culture is most fit for such abnormal men to rise to the top in. The top being minor or major celebrity status in a three-ringed circus society.



So yes, every politician is a hooker, driven by a perverted feminine spirit of narcissism.

Every preacher is a hooker, driven by a perverted feminine spirit of narcissism.

Are there exceptions to this?

Yes, the world leaders who rig elections, wipe out the opposition, stir up controversy & outrage and have harems of supermodels are, indeed, normal, healthy, well adjusted men. And the societies they rule over are the most healthy and well functioning ones.


But the democracies of the west are freak-shows -hopelessly in debt, overrun by orcs, terrorized by crime and corruption and ruled by effeminate men, tranny’s and hookers.


And THAT is the Spirit of 1776 reaching full maturity.


A Kingdom is a Kingdom. A democracy/republic is a whorehouse.





....







Sunday, May 7, 2017

God Vs. Truth...





“...our ancestors were not willing to ignore all that must be ignored to see this as the clockwork universe....they were attuned to what is strange, uncanny, absurd, and horrifying in existence. And so their Allfather, their author of nature, was no benevolent watchmaker, but a dangerous, fickle, unpredictable god.” -Collin Cleary




Nature is wild, chaotic, violent and random. It wars against itself. It devours and destroys itself.

Plants, animals & human beings are all part of this nature and reflect these attributes.


Nature testifies against the monotheistic god of the jews, muslims and christians. It does so in a thousand ways, every single day.


Perhaps this is hard to see in the near-lifeless deserts of west-Asia. But there is more to the world than the deserts of the one-god. Step into a forest and you will see a world that is indeed strange, uncanny, absurd, and horrifying.



This is most likely why rural people were attacked so vehemently  by the monotheists. Pagan, after all, means rural -or rubes, or hicks or country-folk, etc.

The country people resisted the one-god longest. Only converting to a pagan-christian hybrid. And even then they were constantly being attacked and persecuted for their “witchcraft” or “heresies”.

Because, being surrounded by the forests of Europe, they saw most clearly the falseness and inherent bullshit of the one-god hypothesis.


Unfortunately today these attacks have been renewed by SJWs and Progressives, who carry the one-god's presuppositional torch. They, like the monotheists, believe in a linear history (hence, "progress") rather than a cyclical one, which, again, nature tells us is actually true.

And they, like the monotheists before them, detest "the rubes".







...



Friday, May 5, 2017

The REALLY Real You...





Your beliefs, your ideology, your convictions, etc don’t mean jacks*@t.

It’s what you do that matters. It’s what you do that reflects what you actually love and hate -what you actually care for and what you discard as valueless.

But this is a natural and obvious truth that far too many forget or refuse to accept.


What a man says tells you nothing about what he will do.


Cowards often boast of the virtue of bravery. Thieves proclaim their contempt for theft. Back-stabbers cry loudest for loyalty and those who insist on the importance of “good manners” are never, ever to be trusted!


A statement of belief or oath to a creed, either publicly or within yourself, has all the value of a fart on breezy summer day.


The REAL YOU is not on the inside.



The REAL YOU is shown in your deeds and actions, day-in-day-out.







...

Wednesday, May 3, 2017

T-Rex Ate Death?...




Yes, religion is man-made. But so are law, language and rockets.


Religion has two aspects -the first is it’s use as an engineering, or fortification, plan for a society -how to organize -social mores, ethical codes, etc AKA, human interaction. And the second is how we relate to death -our own and those close to us.


But get a neo-Atheist and an “on fire for the lord” neo-Christian together for a debate or discussion  and what is most likely going to be the topic? The origin of life or how old the earth is or some such thing.

This is comical and irritating to those of us trying to have a constructive discussion of the issue.


Let me drive this point home -religion, as it relates to us on a day-to-day, personal level,  deals primarily with issues of personal fear and anxiety, grief and sorrow, over death and the pain and horrific loss it brings.

Death is the great enemy of us all. And as you get older you come to appreciate how terrible and all-powerful death is. Ancient peoples worshiped the sun because it struggled against death -by nourishing life.

Again, sun worship was about contending with death.


And no, this is not about heaven as a paradise in space or a man with a beard in the sky.

In the 2nd aspect of religion, Heaven and God function for the same purpose and to the same ends as a lover feeling (believing) the sentiment that he will love his beloved forever. And he means it! He will love her forever and ever, without end -even though this sentiment is of a quantity and quality that he himself cannot wrap his mind around, even when he allows himself the realistic doubt of its truth.


Religion, in the 2nd aspect, is a poetic attempt to articulate the deep rooted, organic, human need to believe that (against all logic and reason) somehow, some way, somewhere, “we’ll meet again”.


And again, in the broader, more mechanical aspect, religion is about structuring society (human interaction) -which is ultimately like trying to put a barbed-wire fence around a forest fire to control it. But still, we are driven to at least try to make good rules and live by them.



To reiterate,  religion is about two things: social order & death.



So, with that said,


how in the hell did dinosaurs ever get involved in the discussion?






....

Monday, May 1, 2017

Comfort Bitching...






Granted, we’ve all done/do it to one degree or another, for a time. It’s very tempting to try to make a point with information bombardment. But it’s usually a phase that we go through, and then mature out of. After awhile you realize the daily outrage is just that, daily.

Many don’t, however.

And there is nothing that becomes so increasingly irritating as those who do nothing but collect news stories and then whine and bitch about how outrageous their content are.

There they are, sitting on their big fat asses in nice comfy chairs in front of the keyboard or a microphone, reading over headlines that they inform us is certainly apocalyptic. They do this day-after-day, week-after-week, year-after-year, decade after decade.


They never dare offer a solution. No, they just sit there and express their shock and incredulity.......and ask for donations.

It would be like a guy going on his radio show every day complaining about the bear that terrorizes his family. “Well folks, the bear ate another one of my kids this morning. Can you believe it? What is the world coming to?”

If you don’t have the backbone to do something about the bear, at least spare what’s left of your dignity and don’t give a f*#king play-by-play of its rampage in progress.


And this is more generally applicable.

The expressed concern over a world gone mad is sort of undercut by the luxurious, cozy, lifestyles of every single one of these guys that do nothing but fear-monger.

“The world is falling apart. They’re taking our freedoms. Soon they’ll come for us. Things have never been so bad. See you at Dollywood this summer!”



Unless you’re prepared to get off your fat pampered behind and offer concrete, actionable, solutions to the myriad of calamities befalling us, might I suggest you instead turn your focus more towards accentuating the positive. And articulating and celebrating the positive. At least once in a while.



Everybody already knows the world is FUBAR.

Tell us something we don’t know. Like how to rebuild. Tell us about beauty and goodness and truth. Or at least offer critique and assessment and not just feigned outrage. Otherwise, shut up already with the "news of the day" routine.

Don't be like the narcissistic SJW's who subsist by leaching off of the very system they pretend to protest.

Or is it really so much easier (and profitable) to talk about nothing but the inevitability of death rather than the beauty of life?



If you have the ease and comfort in your life to sit around and bitch about how bad things are, then things must not be that bad, for you. Not yet.




It's not enough to know what you are fighting against. Sometimes you need to be reminded of what you are fighting for.







...